26
Oct/09
2

if it’s broke…

Traditional religion has never quite worked for me. Something was still always missing. Yet in the past, I’ve settled into the status quo because it seemed like “the right thing to do.” ButBroken I cannot and will not continue to denounce my questions and concerns simply because it may offend, or is not a majority’s consensus. Do we believe whatever it is we believe because of an obligation to what we’ve been taught? An appeal to tradition? Or do we believe what we believe because of the fear that our ignorance of the alternative produces? A fear of the unknown?

If the mere questioning of theology that some hold indisputable causes separation, the validity of the questioning then proves justified and necessary.

We have every right, and dare I say a duty, to seek spiritual wisdom and truth without personal prejudice or social patronization. It seems that claimed absolutes and goals of “conversion” defeat the purpose and undermine the process and promise of genuine spirituality.

By definition, truth has to be discovered… not created or coerced.

©2009 Tom Leu

29
Mar/09
2

7 habits of unhappy people

If a person consistently engages in any or all of the following; discontent and disillusionment will certainly arise and become a reality. Fair warning…

1. Seeking approval from others. 
This is natural, but only to a point. If approval-seeking dominates your life; do you really have life? Needing inordinate amounts of acceptance and validation from others indicates that you haven’t yet given it to yourself. If we don’t truly value ourselves first, no amount of accolades or approval from others will ever suffice.unhappy

2. Needing to be right.
This is a version of approval-seeking and this habit may also be called 2a. Thinking there is only ONE waytheir way. Rarely, if ever, is there only one way of anything! All-or-nothing thinking is often a hallmark of unhappy people and may be the most dangerous mindset of all. Often, in an ill-fated effort to get respect, some will sacrifice personal contentment for perceived correctness. Being right becomes more important than doing what’s right. At some point, usually later in life for most, we realize and accept the greater value of happiness versus justice; peace versus piety. Am I right?

3. Making small compromises.
Just as we all walk before we run; it’s the little things that always lead to the big things sooner or later. Cutting corners and little white lies add up until we find ourselves cornered in a black hole of life. Stunned, we wonder how we ever got here. Rule of thumb: if you have to be discreet; you probably shouldn’t be doing it.

4. Living in the past.
We often romanticize the past, recreating it in our minds as something better than it really was. But it probably wasn’t necessarily better, it was just different. It was a different time, with different circumstances, usually involving different people, sharing different life experiences. This escape to the “past tense” sometimes produces past tension. On the other hand, you can’t move on from something until you’ve been there first. We need not run from, nor regret the past; simply respect it for what it was, and more importantly, who it has made us today.

5. Living in the future.
Rushing toward a future full of promise is another epidemic of the chronically unhappy. Planning and preparing for tomorrow is good and necessary, but not at the expense of being present today. A better tomorrow can never really become a reality if today is side-stepped or skipped-over. Looking ahead cannot replace living in the here-and-now.

6. Over-indulging in substitutes.
Substitutes are any vice, device or distraction we use to be anywhere else but in the present moment. Substitutes provide temporary escapes from a sometimes uncomfortable or painful reality. It can be as simple as shopping or as debilitating as drug addiction. Not all escape mechanisms are “bad,” we just need to have awareness of them and use wisdom around them. Whatever the substitutes, just be conscious of the amount, frequency and motives behind their use.

7. Going it alone.
Unhappy people are often solo-artists. They are those who rarely ask for help. Whether this “help” is personal, professional, or spiritual in nature, they consistently reject assistance in most cases, most of the time. It’s been written that “God either is or he isn’t.” This isn’t about religion. But this may be about some kind of higher power that offers a person help, hope, and possibly even happiness (eventually). It makes little difference whether you prefer to describe this higher power as a god, diety, source, tradition, or any other term used to describe the indescribable; it’s an inside job. Most people at least acknowledge the possible existence of some sort of infinite presence in the world. Do we always recognize or understand this presence? Unlikely. Have we ever seen evidence of it in the lives of others or in our own lives at times? Most likely. Is it possible that there’s more to know? Dismissal, denial, and rejection often immediately precedes acceptance. You are not alone, nor do you have to go it alone. It’s OK to ask for help.

Both happiness and unhappiness often involve good habits to be harnessed and bad habits to be broken.

©2009 Tom Leu

24
Mar/09
5

what do you call it?

What do you call it when you have strong beliefs and you want something to be true (for you)… so during your ensuing research and investigation (if any), you either consciously or subconsciously filter and interpret the information you find to support your preconceived notions?social-constructionism

From a sociological and psychological perspective, this phenomenon is called social constructionism. All it means is that some thing or concept which may appear to be natural and obvious to those who accept it, is in reality, merely an invention of a some particular group or culture.

The idea is that social constructs are human choices or preferences rather than universal laws. People form beliefs based on their socialization, experiences, preferences, and assumptions, and then institutionalize them as traditions; eventually declaring them as facts – and possibly even laws.

This socially constructed reality is said to be a “re-produced reality” usually carried out, and passed on, by good-intentioned people acting on their human interpretations of their experiences. Technically, social constructionism is actually a form of ethnocentrism or bias.

So how would the actual scientific validity of these viewpoints and findings fare? And if these findings and views were actually skewed or prejudiced in some way, does that mean then that they are not, or cannot be true?

But if they are true (for you)… should they be true for everyone?

For no one?

Can faith (in anything) be measured and/or proven? Some say so.

What say you?

“Miracles don’t prove faith, they’re invitations to faith.” – Unknown

©2009 Tom Leu

11
Mar/09
0

discover yourself

I heard a pastor once say that “self-deception plus self-reliance equals self-destruction.” I agree with only a portion of that equation.

self-awarenessSelf-deception will undoubtedly lead to self-destruction if left unchecked. If we cannot be objective and honest with ourselves about ourselves, we’re done. Game over. “Destruction” in its many forms, will become an eventual certainty. I’m of the opinion that reliance upon a deceptive self is a bad move, but shunning self-reliance all together is equally naive.

So here’s my equation: 

self-awareness + self-reliance = self-discovery

1) self-awareness = paying attention to your attention; objectively looking at what you do and don’t do well; embracing that which inspires you.

2) self-reliance = doing what only YOU are supposed to be doing; not waiting for a “sign” – taking  initiative and pursuing action over apprehension.

3) self-discovery = using that which you are destined to be, do, and have to add value to the world; to leave your legacy.

You’ve got to do the inner work necessary to be consciously aware of what you’re good at and what you’re not; what you like and don’t like; your strengths AND your weaknesses. It requires looking in the mirror objectively

A person who embraces their strengths, and then is empowered to take the initiative necessary to use those strengths positively, eventually “discovers” themself. And this self-discovery inevitably leads to selflessness, which in-and-of itself, is a spiritual concept.

©2009 Tom Leu

9
Oct/08
1

Why is it…? #8

why is it?…that people will celebrate someone’s assertions of individuality and independence verbally, but then often condemn and sabotage it behaviorally?

©2008 Tom Leu

 

19
Sep/08
0

in belief we trust

People trust their beliefs, whether they’re actually true or not.

To believe in something requires only an intellectual agreement with the perceived facts – produced from one’s knowledge. To fully trust in something requires an authentic emotional connection with the source - producing one’s truth.

While we may applaud someone’s strong beliefs and heartfelt convictions (their truth), we have to connect to the feelings around their experience to ultimately be swayed in their direction (for it to become our truth).

Believing in… and, trusting in… are not the same truth, in and of themselves.

©2008 Tom Leu

14
Sep/08
2

Why is it…? #7

why is it?…that very often, people’s observable, outward behaviors send a message that is the exact opposite of how they truly feel on the inside?

©2008 Tom Leu

5
Sep/08
1

your church sucks?

Do you think other churches, religions, traditions, or faiths suck because they’re different than yours? For something to suck, something else has to be better right… to not suck? People are compelled to rank things; to put stuff in order from best to worst. It’s human nature. It helps us make sense of things and feel better about that which we don’t have the time or energy it takes to truly understand.

Most people can drive by the numerous local churches in their cities and towns without really knowing how they all differ. A lot of people claim they attend a church, but few can give you good reasons why they attend. The questions really shouldn’t be “if” or “where” you attend, but ”Why did you choose that one?” The names of the churces on the signs out front mean little to most people because they’ve never taken the time to really look into it.

Except for a rare few theologically educated and astute individuals, (myself excluded), descriptions like evangelical, episcopalian, baptist, presbyterian, methodist, lutheran, pentecostal, adventist, etc., mean very little to most people because there is little understanding of what these words mean and what these denominations actually believe.

So why do so many adhere then to some “religion” that they don’t fully understand? And why do so many (yes I’ll say it), blindly follow a set of faith principles that they really only understand on a surface level. And why do these same people then criticize others who disagree with them? For example, to claim to be a “Christian” in the United States can have very different and diverse meanings, though few really understand these differences.

Good communicators and individuals of influence are able to disagree without being disrespectful.

So, no, your church doesn’t suck. Neither does mine, or hers, or his, or theirs. That’s the whole point… that’s the irony here. I am not shooting down any specific religion, tradition, belief or faith. Rather, I’d propose building them up through awareness from discussion and exploration. Endorsing or opposing anything without proper and thorough knowledge is ridiculous. Though we’ve all been guilty of this from time to time if we’re being honest.

“There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance – that principle is contempt prior to investigation.” – Herbert Spencer

©2008 Tom Leu

20
Aug/08
0

the longest journey

True contentment and serenity are matters of the heart. We cannot think them into place; try as we might. Everyone needs to make some changes from time to time to cure what ails us. Genuine change begins in the mind but has to travel down to the heart to have lasting impact. The behavior follows the thinking. It’s been said that the longest journey is the 18 inches between the head and the heart. Intellectual knowledge turned into emotional wisdom is where real progress and breakthroughs are made. It’s not enough to know it; we have to experience it for it to be real to us.

©2008 Tom Leu

3
Aug/08
2

working out

I think, for a lot of us, working out or exercising and embarking on ”spiritual” pursuits are procrastinated similarly. It usually goes something like this: 1) you know you ought to, 2) you realize it’s good for you, 3) you often don’t feel like it, 4) but when you do, you’re always glad that you did.

©2008 Tom Leu