lost and found
Many religious adherents applaud those who claim to have been "lost" but are now "found" - this is viewed as good.
Their system is set up to save the lost and free the found. The lost are herded into the confines of the flock where they are shown the way... the right way; the only way, some say. They join the team and begin to identify with the like-minded, previously lost, but now-found-fellowship. Their new-found conviction now requires the recruitment of new converts. And on and on it goes...
But what about those who claim no need for some brand of spiritual group identification or belonging? There are many well-adjusted people who have no need to be affiliated with some group to know who they are - and no need to be told and sold what to believe in. This is viewed as bad because these folks (according to the fellowship), are still lost - blindly believing they aren't. See how it works? The only true way is their way... those who "believe the good stuff" as I've heard it said. You cannot win for losing. And "winning" of course means an eternal spiritual victory and everlasting life because you chose the right team.
This is self-serving, circular reasoning that initially appears very compelling, but is hardly true. One's identity need not be produced from some group ideology. As soon as one has to "belong" to some group to really belong, the purpose of the group is now defeated and its value diminished.
Here's a thought:
Instead of "lost" → "found"
How about "learning" → "growing" → "fulfilled"
Works for me...
Photo - July 17th, 1963: A collection of bibles at a lost and found area at a Jehovah's Witness convention. (Photo by Reg Lancaster/Express/Getty Images)
©2008 Tom Leu












October 8th, 2008 - 22:41
Have you heard about a book called Red-Letter Christians by Tony Campolo? The term ‘red-letter’ comes from the fact that, in some editions of the Bible, the words of Christ are printed in red text. Campolo asserts that the messages of Christ- forgiving your enemies, loving your neighbor, taking care of the poor, (and my personal favorite, “let he who is without sin cast the first stone”)- are sadly not practiced by many of those who identify themselves as Christian. Campolo said, “Evangelicals often evade what Jesus said in those red letters in the Bible”. He is not deliberately adversarial, but he doesn’t pull any punches either. I think you might like this book, you can read a decent-sized excerpt of it here:
http://www.tonycampolo.org/doc/Red_Letter_Christians_1.pdf